Core i5-3210M vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 51.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 51.7 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.9k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.73k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
2.6k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
7.55k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
2.61k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.03k (x0.51)
TOTAL
19.42k
14.79k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.79k
17.41k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
18.77k
75.46k (x4.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.74k
26.25k (x3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
4.65k (x1.01)
TOTAL
37.89k
123.78k (x3.27)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.59k
8.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
12.06k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
4.01k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
2.89k (x0.84)
TOTAL
24.51k
27.18k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
61.34k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
90.21k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.93k
26.2k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
4.62k (x1.01)
TOTAL
53.67k
182.37k (x3.4)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.11k
6.04k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
10.18k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.46k
2.74k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
2.41k (x0.7)
TOTAL
24.9k
21.37k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.72k
47.51k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
21.09k
75.12k (x3.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
19.72k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.54k
5.45k (x1.54)
TOTAL
51.73k
147.8k (x2.86)
Performance/W
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
603 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1478 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2939 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2863 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1117 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1112 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
8032 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4