| | | | | | |

Core i5-3210M vs Pentium N3540


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1.4 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
30678
Core
Ivy Bridge
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
24.9k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.73k points
37.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
1.37k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
2k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
1.95k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
1.21k (x0.3)
TOTAL
19.42k
6.53k (x0.34)

Multithread

i5-3210M

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
5.79k
5.24k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
18.77k
7.69k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.74k
7.31k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
1.52k (x0.33)
TOTAL
37.89k
21.76k (x0.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
8.59k
4.97k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
2.58k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
1.98k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
1.2k (x0.35)
TOTAL
24.51k
10.72k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-3210M

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
18.92k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
9.67k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.93k
7.37k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
1.54k (x0.33)
TOTAL
53.67k
37.5k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
577 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
570 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
1533 points/W
5357 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2864 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1114 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
7908 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4