| | | |

Core i5-3210M vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the 4415U gets 56.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
Jun 2012
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3083
2339 (-24.11%)
Test#2 (FP)
8582
9513 (10.85%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3762
3050 (-18.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3989
2585 (-35.19%)
TOTAL
19416
17488 (-9.93%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
5787
4711 (-18.59%)
Test#2 (FP)
18774
21734 (15.77%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8741
7346 (-15.96%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4588
2435 (-46.94%)
TOTAL
37890
36224 (-4.39%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
8594
8287 (-3.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
8880
11757 (32.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3586
3082 (-14.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3454
3984 (15.34%)
TOTAL
24514
27110 (10.59%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
20179
17228 (-14.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
19961
27345 (36.99%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8935
7406 (-17.11%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4595
4168 (-9.30%)
TOTAL
53670
56146 (4.61%)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
577 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
570 points/W
1823 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
494 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
278 points/W
TOTAL
1533 points/W
3743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/GHz
3603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2864 points/GHz
5112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/GHz
1340 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1114 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
TOTAL
7908 points/GHz
11787 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8