| | | |

Core i5-3210M vs m7-6Y75


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 55.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3210M is 1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
Jun 2012
September 2015

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3210M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
10149
10244 (0.93%)
Test#2 (FP)
9489
15330 (61.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3801
2967 (-21.94%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3799
5316 (39.91%)
TOTAL
27238
33857 (24.30%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
20114
16781 (-16.57%)
Test#2 (FP)
22651
25088 (10.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8928
6137 (-31.26%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3426
5576 (62.73%)
TOTAL
55119
53581 (-2.79%)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
575 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
1575 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3061 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1226 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1226 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
8786 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8