| | | | | | |

Core i5-3210M vs i5-7300U


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 51.7 k points while the i5-7300U gets 84.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
24.9k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.73k points
109.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
3.11k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
8.58k
12.24k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
4.1k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
4.96k (x1.24)
TOTAL
19.42k
24.41k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-3210M

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.79k
6.98k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.77k
32.05k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.74k
10.82k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
5.52k (x1.2)
TOTAL
37.89k
55.36k (x1.46)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.59k
9.96k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
15.11k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.59k
3.87k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
4.54k (x1.31)
TOTAL
24.51k
33.47k (x1.37)

Multithread

i5-3210M

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
25.26k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
19.96k
40.6k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.93k
11.24k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.6k
5.83k (x1.27)
TOTAL
53.67k
82.94k (x1.55)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3210M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.11k
9.85k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
8.88k
17.37k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.46k
3.98k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.45k
5.11k (x1.48)
TOTAL
24.9k
36.31k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-3210M

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.72k
25.37k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
21.09k
43.43k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
10.62k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.54k
5.4k (x1.52)
TOTAL
51.73k
84.82k (x1.64)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
603 points/W
2896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
708 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
1478 points/W
5655 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2939 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2863 points/GHz
4962 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1117 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1112 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
8032 points/GHz
10376 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4