| | | |

Core i5-3210M vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 53.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
100fa0
Core
Ivy Bridge
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
Jun 2012
May 2010

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-3210M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3083
1981 (-35.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
8582
4569 (-46.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3762
2572 (-31.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3989
3514 (-11.90%)
TOTAL
19416
12636 (-34.92%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5787
11863 (105.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
18774
27404 (45.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8741
15390 (76.06%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4588
3456 (-24.67%)
TOTAL
37890
58113 (53.37%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-3210M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8594
5170 (-39.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
8880
5326 (-40.02%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3586
2759 (-23.07%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3454
3513 (1.71%)
TOTAL
24514
16769 (-31.59%)

Multithread

i5-3210M

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
20179
29823 (47.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
19961
30789 (54.25%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8935
15882 (77.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4595
3691 (-19.66%)
TOTAL
53670
80186 (49.41%)

Performance/W
i5-3210M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
577 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
570 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1533 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2772 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2864 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1157 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1114 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
7908 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8