Core i5-3210M vs FX 8350
Description
The i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 55.1 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-3210M gets a score of 55.1 k points while the 8350 gets 117.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
600f20
Core
Ivy Bridge
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2 /2
8/8
TDP
35 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
Jun 2012
October 2012
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-3210M
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
10149
9847 (-2.97%)
Test#2 (FP)
9489
8418 (-11.28%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3801
3576 (-5.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3799
6267 (64.94%)
TOTAL
27238
28107 (3.19%)
Multithread
i5-3210M
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
20114
44810 (122.78%)
Test#2 (FP)
22651
45461 (100.70%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8928
22736 (154.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3426
4898 (42.94%)
TOTAL
55119
117904 (113.91%)
Performance/W
i5-3210M
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
575 points/W
358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
647 points/W
364 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
255 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1575 points/W
943 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-3210M
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3274 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3061 points/GHz
2053 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1226 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1226 points/GHz
1528 points/GHz
TOTAL
8786 points/GHz
6855 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8