Core i5-2500K vs i7-7560U
Description
The i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 89 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2500K gets a score of 111.8 k points while the i7-7560U gets 89 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
806e9
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2011
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
32.85k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
111.83k points
97.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2500K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.84k
12.88k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
10.43k
20.02k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.22k
4.15k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.36k
8.97k (x1.67)
TOTAL
32.85k
46.02k (x1.4)
Multithread
i5-2500K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.51k
23k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
40.83k
41.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
9.92k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
14.9k (x3.11)
TOTAL
111.83k
89.03k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i5-2500K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
479 points/W
1533 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
430 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
218 points/W
661 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
994 points/W
TOTAL
1177 points/W
5935 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2500K
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2818 points/GHz
5268 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1092 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1449 points/GHz
2361 points/GHz
TOTAL
8878 points/GHz
12111 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4