Core i5-2467M vs E2 Series 3800
Description
The i5-2467M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 3800 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 1.3 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2467M gets a score of 29.8 k points while the 3800 gets 22.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2467M is 1.3 times faster than the 3800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
700f01
Core
Sandy Bridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2011
January 2014
Mean monothread perf.
14.78k points
6.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.78k points
22.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2467M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
5.4k
2.24k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
4.9k
2.13k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.4k
1.23k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
0.92k (x0.44)
TOTAL
14.78k
6.52k (x0.44)
Multithread
i5-2467M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
11.67k
8.61k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
10.74k
8.13k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.09k
4.61k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.28k
1.17k (x0.51)
TOTAL
29.78k
22.52k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i5-2467M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/W
574 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
632 points/W
542 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
134 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
1752 points/W
1501 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2467M
3800
Test#1 (Integers)
2347 points/GHz
1725 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2129 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/GHz
943 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
907 points/GHz
708 points/GHz
TOTAL
6424 points/GHz
5016 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4