| | | | | | |

Core i5-2430M vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2430M gets a score of 40.8 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 15.5 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
306e4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2011
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
22.21k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.76k points
633.14k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2430M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.04k
10.53k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
7.37k
9.98k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.53k
4k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
3.4k (x1.04)
TOTAL
22.21k
27.92k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-2430M

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.74k
247.05k (x15.69)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
264.43k (x18.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.16k
111.01k (x15.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
10.66k (x2.8)
TOTAL
40.76k
633.14k (x15.53)

Performance/W
i5-2430M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
450 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
205 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
1165 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2430M
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2680 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2458 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1175 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1091 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
7404 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4