Core i5-2410M vs Pentium E5500
Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 31.3 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.5 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 31.3 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.5 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
1067a
Core
Sandy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.56k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
6.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
2.76k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
0.91k (x0.29)
TOTAL
15.62k
12.77k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-2410M
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
4.32k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
10.8k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
4.7k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
0.87k (x0.28)
TOTAL
31.35k
20.69k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-2410M
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
157 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
411 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
240 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
88 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
896 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
819 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2277 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1090 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
5386 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4