| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 31.3 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.5 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
50657
Core
Sandy Bridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
11264 kB
Date
February 2011
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2410M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.38k
2.59k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
9.5k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.48k
3.15k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
5.9k (x1.87)
TOTAL
15.62k
21.13k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-2410M

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
21.09k (x3.84)
Test#2 (FP)
14.39k
80.93k (x5.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
30.76k (x3.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.09k
8.51k (x2.76)
TOTAL
31.35k
141.3k (x4.51)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
157 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
411 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
240 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
88 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
896 points/W
1662 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
819 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2277 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1200 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1090 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
5386 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4