Core i5-2410M vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 11.9 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 11.9 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
306e4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
10 /20
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
25600 kB
Date
February 2011
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2410M
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.38k
7.26k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
6.76k
6.9k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
2.77k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
2.55k (x0.96)
TOTAL
20.1k
19.48k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-2410M
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.17k
180.2k (x12.72)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
191.43k (x13.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
80.22k (x11.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.87k
7.46k (x2.6)
TOTAL
38.68k
459.31k (x11.87)
Performance/W
i5-2410M
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
198 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
1105 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2543 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2332 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1139 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
6932 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4