Core i5-2410M vs FX 6100
Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 38.7 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 6100 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-2410M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
600f12
Core
Sandy Bridge
Zambezi
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2011
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
65.32k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2410M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7.38k
7.15k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.76k
6.53k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.3k
2.55k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.66k
4.2k (x1.58)
TOTAL
20.1k
20.42k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-2410M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.17k
24.5k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
14.71k
23.85k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
13.45k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.87k
3.51k (x1.22)
TOTAL
38.68k
65.32k (x1.69)
Performance/W
i5-2410M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
405 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
420 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
198 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
82 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
1105 points/W
688 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2543 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2332 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1139 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
917 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
6932 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4