Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E5472
Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5472 gets 44.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 58.9 k points while the E5472 gets 44.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2400 is 1.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
10676
Core
Sandy Bridge
Harpertown
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
January 2011
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
48.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-2400
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.72k
2.29k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
7.6k
5.85k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.44k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.47k
4.81k (x1.08)
TOTAL
18.78k
15.39k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-2400
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
10.37k
9.06k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
28.84k
23.09k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.08k
9.7k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.67k
2.53k (x0.54)
TOTAL
58.95k
44.38k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-2400
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
113 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
304 points/W
289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
49 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
620 points/W
555 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2400
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
801 points/GHz
763 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2236 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1171 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1316 points/GHz
1603 points/GHz
TOTAL
5523 points/GHz
5129 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4