Core i5-2400 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The i5-2400 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2400 gets a score of 84.4 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 6.5 times faster than the i5-2400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
206a7
306e4
Core
Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
10 /20
TDP
95 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2011
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
25.49k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
84.36k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
9.16k
10.55k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
8.2k
10.02k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
3.99k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.17k
3.66k (x0.88)
TOTAL
25.49k
28.23k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-2400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
34.74k
215.04k (x6.19)
Test#2 (FP)
31.07k
230.43k (x7.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
96.87k (x6.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
8.76k (x2.37)
TOTAL
84.36k
551.1k (x6.53)
Performance/W
i5-2400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
366 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
327 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
888 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-2400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2695 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2411 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1163 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1228 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
7497 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4