| | | | | | |

Core i5-2320 vs i3-6006U


Description
The i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2320 gets a score of 66.5 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2320 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
406e3
Core
Sandy Bridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2011
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
24.01k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
66.48k points
67.91k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-2320
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.88k
7.34k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.84k
11.37k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.79k
2.74k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.08k (x0.88)
TOTAL
24.01k
24.53k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-2320

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.98k
15.32k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.48k
25.61k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.42k
6.36k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.58k (x0.99)
TOTAL
66.48k
49.87k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-2320
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
295 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
258 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
120 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
700 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2320
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2689 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2375 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1063 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7277 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4