| | | | | | |

Core i5-14600K vs Xeon E5-2680 v4


Description
The i5-14600K is based on Raptor Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-14600K gets a score of 1066.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-14600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
406f1
Core
Raptor Lake-R
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
14/20
14/28
TDP
125 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
35840 kB
Date
October 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
114.78k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
1066.57k points
1162.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-14600K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
51.59k
17.8k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
16.51k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.42k
4.47k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.58k
2.56k (x0.15)
TOTAL
114.78k
41.35k (x0.36)

Multithread

i5-14600K

E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
473.05k
494.82k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
375.3k
514.13k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
189.55k
132.87k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.68k
20.8k (x0.73)
TOTAL
1066.57k
1162.63k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i5-14600K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3784 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3002 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1516 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8533 points/W
9689 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-14600K
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9734 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5697 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2909 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3317 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
21657 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4