| | | | | | |

Core i5-14600K vs i9-13900HX


Description
Both models i5-14600K and i9-13900HX are based on Raptor Lake architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-14600K gets a score of 1066.6 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.1 times faster than the i5-14600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
b0671
b0671
Core
Raptor Lake-R
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
14/20
24/32
TDP
125 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x2048/2x4096 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
October 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
114.78k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
1066.57k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-14600K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
51.59k
53.69k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
28.76k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.42k
14.93k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.58k
15.47k (x0.88)
TOTAL
114.78k
112.85k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-14600K

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
473.05k
526.44k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
375.3k
420.48k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
189.55k
196.13k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.68k
17.68k (x0.62)
TOTAL
1066.57k
1160.72k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i5-14600K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3784 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3002 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1516 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
229 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
8533 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-14600K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
9734 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5697 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2909 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3317 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
21657 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4