Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.8 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10600K is 1.8 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.09k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
365.67k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.27k
14.58k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
26.42k
23.98k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.07k
5.35k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.33k
6.34k (x0.56)
TOTAL
74.09k
50.25k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-10600K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
164.69k
57.37k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
156.45k
107.03k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.39k
28.9k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.15k
7.05k (x0.99)
TOTAL
365.67k
200.34k (x0.55)
Performance/W
i5-10600K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1317 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1252 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2925 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6306 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5505 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
15436 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4