| | | | | | |

Core i5-10600K vs i5-11400F


Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.09k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
365.67k points
495.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.27k
31.66k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
26.42k
26.21k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.07k
11.96k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.33k
18.5k (x1.63)
TOTAL
74.09k
88.34k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-10600K

i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
164.69k
210.36k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
156.45k
203.84k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.39k
72.05k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.15k
9.4k (x1.32)
TOTAL
365.67k
495.65k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i5-10600K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1317 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1252 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
2925 points/W
7625 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6306 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5505 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15436 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4