| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the W-2223. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
50657
Core
Comet Lake-S
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.97k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
14.5k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.78k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
8.19k (x0.68)
TOTAL
36.89k
31.45k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-10500T

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
15.56k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
59.23k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
22.87k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
6.85k (x1.83)
TOTAL
161.83k
104.51k (x0.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
25.09k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
20.76k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.07k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
8.76k (x0.73)
TOTAL
64.6k
59.68k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-10500T

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
111.43k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
100.2k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
24.67k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
6.89k (x1.84)
TOTAL
302.13k
243.18k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4