| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs Xeon E5-1660 v3


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
352.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
20.92k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
11.87k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.67k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
3.85k (x0.32)
TOTAL
64.6k
41.31k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-10500T

E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
174.59k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
116.47k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
44.79k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
17.1k (x4.58)
TOTAL
302.13k
352.96k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
2521 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4