| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs Pentium G645


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G645 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 245.7 k points while the G645 gets 35.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 6.9 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206a7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
22.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
35.38k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
8.66k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
6.9k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
3.48k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
3.2k (x0.28)
TOTAL
50.7k
22.24k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-10500T

G645
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
14.06k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
11.82k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
5.83k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.69k (x0.99)
TOTAL
245.75k
35.38k (x0.14)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
2348 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3550 points/W
182 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1017 points/W
90 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
7021 points/W
544 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
3669 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5267 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1404 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3002 points/GHz
1103 points/GHz
TOTAL
13341 points/GHz
7669 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4