| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
25.93k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
22.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
5.11k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
11.46k (x0.96)
TOTAL
64.6k
65.33k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
130.68k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
119.91k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
28.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
7.08k (x1.9)
TOTAL
302.13k
286.43k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4