Core i5-10500T vs i5-8265U
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
143.23k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.68k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
16.08k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
4.99k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
7.95k (x0.66)
TOTAL
36.89k
32.69k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
14.29k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
61.15k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
16.53k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.72k (x1)
TOTAL
161.83k
95.69k (x0.59)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
13.6k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
20.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
5.19k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
7.05k (x0.62)
TOTAL
50.7k
45.87k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
51.42k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
77.48k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
16.65k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.69k (x0.99)
TOTAL
245.75k
149.24k (x0.61)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
13.66k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
21.17k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
5k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
8.11k (x0.71)
TOTAL
51.82k
47.94k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
51.36k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
79.72k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
16.61k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
3.75k (x1.01)
TOTAL
233.94k
151.44k (x0.65)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
19.19k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
17.47k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.04k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
5.97k (x0.5)
TOTAL
64.6k
46.67k (x0.72)
Multithread
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
64.43k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
61.91k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
13.36k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.52k (x0.94)
TOTAL
302.13k
143.23k (x0.47)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4