Core i5-10500T vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
14.34k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
17.67k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
6.41k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
14.95k (x1.25)
TOTAL
64.6k
53.37k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10500T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
83.58k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
119.22k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
48.56k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
302.13k
255.19k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i5-10500T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4