| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
7.33k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
18.27k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
12.8k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
13.2k (x1.09)
TOTAL
36.89k
51.61k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
29.24k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
83.32k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
54.53k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.99k (x1.34)
TOTAL
161.83k
172.07k (x1.06)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.94k
23.53k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
23.51k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
14.71k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.41k
13.24k (x1.16)
TOTAL
50.7k
74.99k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.18k
106.07k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
124.23k
115.88k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.6k
60.53k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
5.88k (x1.58)
TOTAL
245.75k
288.36k (x1.17)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
23.03k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
24.11k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.21k
13.9k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.42k
12.11k (x1.06)
TOTAL
51.82k
73.15k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.38k
111.78k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
115.64k
124.18k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.22k
59.87k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.71k
5.76k (x1.55)
TOTAL
233.94k
301.58k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
36.73k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
22.09k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
11.24k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
11.58k (x0.97)
TOTAL
64.6k
81.64k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
130.18k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
110.21k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
50.76k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
6.31k (x1.69)
TOTAL
302.13k
297.46k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4