| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i3-1220P


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
37.43k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
19.6k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
12.99k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
11.9k (x0.99)
TOTAL
64.6k
81.92k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
178.85k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
153.82k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
69.38k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
2.69k (x0.72)
TOTAL
302.13k
404.74k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4