Core i5-10500H vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 290.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 290.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.5 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906c0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
9.83k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
9.74k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
3.65k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
3.88k (x0.31)
TOTAL
57.21k
27.1k (x0.47)
Multithread
i5-10500H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
25.04k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
24.7k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
9.29k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.06k (x0.96)
TOTAL
290.85k
64.09k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1489 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2294 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
610 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
4475 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3531 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5054 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1353 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2776 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
12713 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4