| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806d0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
4.4k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
20.25k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
11.69k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
11.66k (x0.93)
TOTAL
41.26k
48.01k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
38.93k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
191.89k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
108.8k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
14.95k (x2.83)
TOTAL
191.41k
354.57k (x1.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
15.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
25.2k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
12.66k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
11.66k (x0.93)
TOTAL
57.21k
64.74k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
155.37k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
260.27k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
115.37k (x2.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
20.04k (x3.8)
TOTAL
290.85k
551.04k (x1.89)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
17.25k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
25.53k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
12.56k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
11.4k (x0.96)
TOTAL
57.69k
66.74k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
144.5k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
243.41k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
109.02k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
16k (x2.96)
TOTAL
295.96k
512.94k (x1.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
30.84k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
26.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
12.66k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
11.74k (x0.91)
TOTAL
72.1k
81.62k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
294.86k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
280.92k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
113.9k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
20.16k (x3.84)
TOTAL
378.99k
709.85k (x1.87)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4