Core i5-10500H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 7840HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the 7840HS gets 622.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a70f41
Core
Comet Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
91.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
622.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
31.57k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
25.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
12.42k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
21.93k (x1.71)
TOTAL
72.1k
91.11k (x1.26)
Multithread
i5-10500H
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
265.26k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
226.13k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
114.46k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
16.49k (x3.14)
TOTAL
378.99k
622.34k (x1.64)
Performance/W
i5-10500H
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
7579 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
6461 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
3270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
471 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
17781 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
7840HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
6190 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
4941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
4299 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
17866 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4