| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i7-12700K


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i7-12700K gets 1034.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700K is 2.7 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
90672
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/20
TDP
65 W
190 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
110.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
1034.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
8.44k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
21.1k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
14.52k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
12.87k (x1.03)
TOTAL
41.26k
56.92k (x1.38)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
70.7k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
251.29k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
159.92k (x4.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
32.47k (x6.14)
TOTAL
191.41k
514.38k (x2.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
52.13k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
28.97k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
15.04k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
14.07k (x1.09)
TOTAL
72.1k
110.2k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
458.8k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
377.45k (x2.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
171.31k (x4.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
26.51k (x5.05)
TOTAL
378.99k
1034.06k (x2.73)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
2415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
1987 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
902 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
5442 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
10425 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
3008 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
22040 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4