| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500H vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500H gets a score of 379 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a4
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
72.1k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
378.99k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
7.33k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.92k
18.27k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
12.8k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.55k
13.2k (x1.05)
TOTAL
41.26k
51.61k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
29.24k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
118.16k
83.32k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.43k
54.53k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.29k
4.99k (x0.94)
TOTAL
191.41k
172.07k (x0.9)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.89k
23.53k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.74k
23.51k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.09k
14.71k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.49k
13.24k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.21k
74.99k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
96.8k
106.07k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
149.1k
115.88k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.68k
60.53k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.28k
5.88k (x1.11)
TOTAL
290.85k
288.36k (x0.99)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.86k
23.03k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
24.11k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
13.9k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.82k
12.11k (x1.02)
TOTAL
57.69k
73.15k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
97.37k
111.78k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
154.42k
124.18k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.76k
59.87k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.4k
5.76k (x1.07)
TOTAL
295.96k
301.58k (x1.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.93k
36.73k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.41k
22.09k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
11.24k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
11.58k (x0.9)
TOTAL
72.1k
81.64k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-10500H

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
176.41k
130.18k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
158.8k
110.21k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.53k
50.76k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
6.31k (x1.2)
TOTAL
378.99k
297.46k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
2714 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2443 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
81 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5831 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6207 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2856 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
16023 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4