Core i5-10500 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.52k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
8.68k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
2.83k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
3.13k (x0.22)
TOTAL
42.82k
18.17k (x0.42)
Multithread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
32.7k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
105.18k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
35.18k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
9.54k (x1.24)
TOTAL
191.54k
182.59k (x0.95)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
11.08k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
9.57k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.18k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
3.28k (x0.23)
TOTAL
59.79k
27.11k (x0.45)
Multithread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
139.07k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
133.47k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
46.6k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
6.65k (x0.85)
TOTAL
288.77k
325.78k (x1.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
11.18k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
10.06k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
3.21k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
3.12k (x0.23)
TOTAL
60.69k
27.57k (x0.45)
Multithread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
140.98k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
145.37k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
45.62k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
6.75k (x0.87)
TOTAL
297.94k
338.73k (x1.14)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
18.62k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
10.49k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.04k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
3.26k (x0.23)
TOTAL
75.27k
36.41k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
236.25k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
151.05k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
58.9k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
6.7k (x0.81)
TOTAL
387.99k
452.9k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4