| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
13.1k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
11.91k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.83k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
3.83k (x0.28)
TOTAL
60.69k
33.68k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-10500

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
105.42k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
109.99k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
44.56k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
17.7k (x2.28)
TOTAL
297.94k
277.66k (x0.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
20.99k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
11.9k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.72k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
3.75k (x0.26)
TOTAL
75.27k
41.36k (x0.55)

Multithread

i5-10500

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
172.62k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
110.03k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
44.06k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
16.93k (x2.04)
TOTAL
387.99k
343.64k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i5-10500
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4