Core i5-10500 vs i9-9900KF
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
592.86k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
33.03k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
29.52k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
6.55k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
15.45k (x1.07)
TOTAL
75.27k
84.54k (x1.12)
Multithread
i5-10500
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
276.22k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
250.61k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
57.2k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
8.84k (x1.06)
TOTAL
387.99k
592.86k (x1.53)
Performance/W
i5-10500
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
6241 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4