| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs i5-7400


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-7400 gets 173.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
173.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
12.72k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
19.3k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
4.76k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
8.73k (x0.64)
TOTAL
60.69k
45.52k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-10500

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
47.95k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
71.98k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
17.22k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
8.03k (x1.03)
TOTAL
297.94k
145.18k (x0.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
22.37k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
19.46k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.44k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
6.41k (x0.44)
TOTAL
75.27k
52.69k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-10500

i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
79.57k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
71.41k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
16.44k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
6.27k (x0.75)
TOTAL
387.99k
173.7k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-10500
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
1224 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
1099 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
2672 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i5-7400
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5561 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
15053 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4