| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs i7-12700H


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
643.29k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
7.95k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
19.74k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
13.29k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
14.97k (x1.05)
TOTAL
42.82k
55.95k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
53.64k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
171.15k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
94.92k (x2.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
9.24k (x1.2)
TOTAL
191.54k
328.95k (x1.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
24.26k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
24.03k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
14.75k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
12.08k (x0.86)
TOTAL
59.79k
75.12k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
199.99k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
218.01k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
102.62k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
9.42k (x1.21)
TOTAL
288.77k
530.04k (x1.84)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
25.81k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
26.18k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
14.71k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
13.88k (x1.02)
TOTAL
60.69k
80.58k (x1.33)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
203.61k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
249.64k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
101.32k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
9.55k (x1.23)
TOTAL
297.94k
564.12k (x1.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
41.64k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
25.48k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
13.2k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
12.8k (x0.89)
TOTAL
75.27k
93.12k (x1.24)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
276.56k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
251.6k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
104.55k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
10.58k (x1.27)
TOTAL
387.99k
643.29k (x1.66)

Performance/W
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4