| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.26k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.52k
19.54k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.58k
10.95k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.2k
11.08k (x0.78)
TOTAL
42.82k
45.84k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
15.69k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
120.48k
68.3k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.12k
33.66k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.68k
12.16k (x1.58)
TOTAL
191.54k
129.81k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.3k
14.48k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.22k
24.18k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
11.95k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
11.01k (x0.78)
TOTAL
59.79k
61.62k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
92.61k
50.98k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
147.68k
80.7k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.71k
36.61k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
12.02k (x1.54)
TOTAL
288.77k
180.32k (x0.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.33k
16.27k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.73k
25.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
11.5k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.64k
10.82k (x0.79)
TOTAL
60.69k
64.32k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
91.64k
54k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
158.71k
88.76k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.84k
35.23k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.76k
12.14k (x1.56)
TOTAL
297.94k
190.12k (x0.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
22.97k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
21.61k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
8.99k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
8.52k (x0.59)
TOTAL
75.27k
62.1k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-10500

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
82.75k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
86.58k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
29.34k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
11.72k (x1.41)
TOTAL
387.99k
210.4k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4