Core i5-10500 vs i5-11400F
Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
31.66k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
11.96k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
18.5k (x1.28)
TOTAL
75.27k
88.34k (x1.17)
Multithread
i5-10500
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
210.36k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
203.84k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
72.05k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
9.4k (x1.13)
TOTAL
387.99k
495.65k (x1.28)
Performance/W
i5-10500
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4