| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
50654
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2995 (-25.19%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
12285 (-13.42%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
3636 (-21.30%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
6545 (-40.65%)
TOTAL
33842
25461 (-24.76%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
20421 (-10.31%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
95833 (-0.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
30881 (-2.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
9696 (295.59%)
TOTAL
153456
156831 (2.20%)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
18777 (-14.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
16250 (-18.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
3990 (-12.62%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
6800 (-39.85%)
TOTAL
57847
45818 (-20.80%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
133547 (-2.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
108426 (-19.84%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
30020 (-8.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
9481 (282.61%)
TOTAL
307175
281476 (-8.37%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9