| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.7 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
10676
Core
Comet Lake-S
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
kB
Date
April 2020
November 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2288 (-42.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
5850 (-58.77%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
2441 (-47.16%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
4810 (-56.39%)
TOTAL
33842
15388 (-54.53%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
9063 (-60.19%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
23090 (-76.09%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
9698 (-69.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2529 (3.16%)
TOTAL
153456
44379 (-71.08%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
2883 (-77.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
6356 (-64.58%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
2549 (-47.21%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
4830 (-55.33%)
TOTAL
46191
16617 (-64.02%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
11189 (-85.01%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
24850 (-79.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
10037 (-69.25%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
2541 (0.86%)
TOTAL
229416
48617 (-78.81%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9