| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2690 0


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 235.8 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
8 /16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2012

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
12498
8759 (-29.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
19053
7346 (-61.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4722
3857 (-18.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10297
3320 (-67.76%)
TOTAL
46570
23281 (-50.01%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
74581
78509 (5.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
126959
66455 (-47.66%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31762
36419 (14.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2497
3877 (55.24%)
TOTAL
235799
185259 (-21.43%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
2131 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3627 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
907 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
6737 points/W
1372 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3472 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5292 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2860 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
12936 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9