Core i5-10400T vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
18.86k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
10.06k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.14k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
3.24k (x0.29)
TOTAL
57.85k
36.31k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-10400T
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
218.93k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
139.75k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
55.47k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
12.42k (x5.01)
TOTAL
307.18k
426.58k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4