Core i5-10400T vs Pentium G4560
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
13012 (3.19%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
18744 (4.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
5056 (4.73%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
7399 (-31.57%)
TOTAL
46191
44211 (-4.29%)
Multithread
i5-10400T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
27218 (-63.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
43794 (-63.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
11741 (-64.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
7157 (184.05%)
TOTAL
229416
89911 (-60.81%)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1665 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9