Core i5-10400T vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.9 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.9 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
35 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
12.61k
11.73k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
10.45k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.55k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
3.83k (x0.35)
TOTAL
46.19k
30.56k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-10400T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
74.62k
22.99k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
119.63k
20.53k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.65k
8.82k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.52k
6.55k (x2.6)
TOTAL
229.42k
58.89k (x0.26)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4