| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 229.4 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.1 times faster than the 4415U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-S
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400T
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
4004
2339 (-41.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
14189
9513 (-32.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4620
3050 (-33.98%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11029
2585 (-76.56%)
TOTAL
33842
17488 (-48.33%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
22767
4711 (-79.31%)
Test#2 (FP)
96586
21734 (-77.50%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31652
7346 (-76.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2451
2435 (-0.67%)
TOTAL
153456
36224 (-76.39%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-10400T
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
12610
8290 (-34.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
17941
11823 (-34.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4828
3092 (-35.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
10811
4185 (-61.29%)
TOTAL
46191
27389 (-40.70%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
74617
17238 (-76.90%)
Test#2 (FP)
119634
27398 (-77.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32645
7442 (-77.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2520
4312 (71.13%)
TOTAL
229416
56389 (-75.42%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2132 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3418 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
3503 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4984 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3003 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
12831 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9