Core i5-10400T vs i9-9880H
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
27.81k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
25.88k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
5.65k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
14.19k (x1.25)
TOTAL
57.85k
73.53k (x1.27)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
175.69k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
166.56k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
35.04k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
4.23k (x1.71)
TOTAL
307.18k
381.53k (x1.24)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4