| | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i7-9850H


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-9850H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
Jun 2019

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
21999
19829 (-9.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
19977
16519 (-17.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4566
3867 (-15.32%)
Test#1 (Memory)
11306
9021 (-20.21%)
TOTAL
57847
49236 (-14.89%)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
136687
130192 (-4.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
135254
121438 (-10.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32756
28052 (-14.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2478
9620 (288.21%)
TOTAL
307175
289302 (-5.82%)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.9